data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa061/fa061c0d6a1c72bd9bee054c82ad6e5fa1afe6b6" alt=""
Modeling the present seems, to me anyway, much more difficult then modeling the past. I suppose it because it's a language I have been working in. For instance, every time I begin to plan a building I'm thinking clapboard, beat up wooden fence, lots of details, etc...instead I need to be thinking sparse, metal siding, concrete block, some details...when I look at an empty space on my layout I can quickly visualize some ram shackle building crammed into whatever available shape I can. Fortunately all I need to do is leave the basement and go drive around and look at modern buildings and details for reference. I can't wing it like I would with the character driven, detailed buildings I'm used to. It's an interesting challenge for sure. There are times when I think this whole endeavor might be to boring, plain - but when I see examples like East Rail, I feel otherwise. More than anything I like the idea of doing something different in model railroading.
And when I get stuck, I'll get a jump on my 1950's layout just a few feet away. I'm looking forward to switching gears between each layout.
P.S. If you haven't checked out the new Craftsman Structure Show kit, visit www.css08.com.
And if you haven't seen our new video features on our site, check out http://www.foslimited.com/VIDEOS_ALL.htm It's new for us so bear with us with the shakey camera work...(we're getting a better tripod)....the quality will improve, hopefully.